Re: Satellites cause light pollution

From: Ben Huset (benhuset@skypoint.com)
Date: Sun Feb 23 2003 - 17:57:49 EST

  • Next message: George Roberts: "Re: Delta 1 deb decayed?"

    A few sub-scale 'tests' were flown on Progress in the 80's.
    with 'ok' results.  Unfolding the mylar didn't always go smoothly.
    
    A 'MAJOR' lack of cash has put it on hold till further notice.
    
    The plan was to setup large many kilometer on a side mylar
    sheets in geosync orbit that would reflect sunlight down to wintertime
    northern
    Siberia so oil, mining and logging crews could work more and longer
    days.
    
    Reflected Light would have been as bright as a full moon on the ground. 
    
    This is cheaper than trying to setup nighttime lighting and then
    supplying
    the generators with diesel.
    
    Unless you were under the beam  area, a few sq. miles, the light
    pollution wouldn't be that bad.  
    
    Light pollution yes, cheap raw resources from poor russians, maybe.  
    
    --Ben
    
    Firat Barlas wrote:
    > 
    > I remember an article couple of years ago says that Russians was planning to
    > construct huge mirror-satellites to reflect sunlight to North of Russia. Did
    > you heard anything about that project?
    > 
    > This would be really light-pollution, if they've done..
    > 
    > Firat Barlas
    > 
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe from SeeSat-L, send a message with 'unsubscribe'
    > in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@satobs.org
    > List archived at http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe from SeeSat-L, send a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@satobs.org
    List archived at http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 18:09:16 EST