On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:42:41 -0600, you (Steven Rogers <srogers1@austin.rr.com>) wrote: >I would think the smartest thing they could do would be to say "finders >keepers" with the proviso that you first turn your shuttle bit over to >the investigation. Frequent idea over in sci.space.shuttle whenever the topic of Challenger wreckage getting washed ashore arises. Usually gets shot down by really knowledgable folks on that matter with many good reasons. Googling for this ought to bring up many nice posts telling that this isn't going to happen and why. My recollection is that US law is fairly strict in that regard, but I don't know the details. >But NASA isn't in the business of generating value, they're in the >business of making sure that nobody makes a profit. Let's keep the spite out of this place, okay? Thanks. CU! Markus ----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 05 2003 - 20:57:48 EST