Re: orbital debris report

From: bob@zarya.info
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 14:03:57 EST

  • Next message: Markus Mehring: "Re: [dsat] A sewed and crumpled canvas cover !"

    Cosmos 149 and Cosmos 320 were designed and built as high-drag 
    objects. The standard "Cosmos" ellipsoidal body had an annular 
    structure attached to long rods that held it some distance from the 
    main body.
    
    The ring was mounted at right angles to the rods and provided drag. 
    This allowed it to be used as a stabilisation device, orienting the 
    satellite with the main body pointing forward along the orbital path. 
    This is similar to the way feathers stabilise an arrow.
    
    The low orbit used in order for the stabilisation to work, and the 
    relatively-large surface area of the ring, led to rapid decay of the 
    orbit.
    
    On 4 Feb 2003 at 8:34, jcm@head-cfa.cfa.harvard.edu wrote:
    
    > 
    > Ed,
    >  The http://www.fai.org/astronautics/100km.asp
    > link is pretty much rubbish and has a number of errors in it; in particular
    > the reference which you mention, which as Igor points out refers to Kosmos-149 or Kosmos-320,
    > sounds like it is rehashing a vague memory of the author; TLEs show rapid decay within a few hours
    > of reaching 200 km, not 100 km.........._____________________________
    
    Robert Christy
    bob@zarya.info
    www.zarya.info
    _____________________________
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 04 2003 - 14:15:48 EST