Re: Geodetic precision

From: Christian F. Ackermann (chracker@mail.uni-mainz.de)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2001 - 02:00:05 PDT

Next message: David Brierley: "DMB Rest of Aug 20-21 obs"

Previous message: JAY RESPLER: "Re: Research satellite vs. Operational satellite"
Maybe in reply to: Bruno Tilgner: "Geodetic precision"
Next in thread: Kevin Fetter: "Re: Geodetic precision"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Markus Mehring wrote:
> Yes, and the response was that while this is a neat idea in theory, it
> also is not necessary here and hence won't happen. I think that was
> pretty much clear, so what exactly is it that you're not getting there?

Won't happen? Pretty much clear? I changed my position (see below) and: it really didn't
hurt! Btw: did someone see a satellite in the last few days?

Cheers, Christian



Christian Ackermann
50.0133N
08.2502E
134m
(WGS84)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: David Brierley: "DMB Rest of Aug 20-21 obs"
Previous message: JAY RESPLER: "Re: Research satellite vs. Operational satellite"
Maybe in reply to: Bruno Tilgner: "Geodetic precision"
Next in thread: Kevin Fetter: "Re: Geodetic precision"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 22 2001 - 02:00:31 PDT